Age discrimination in the workforce has been a common
occurrence towards both the old and the young. The former, is considered hard
to teach and difficult to stay up-to-date with the latest technology. The
latter, are considered to have a lack of loyalty to their place of work and
respect for the more mature worker. Of the least acknowledged and most
persistent prejudices in Canadian society, ageism is one of the most
prevailing.
Our economy has fluctuated so significantly over the past
few years, that our aging demographic is taking the blow. Most Canadians 55-64 years
old are at the age when one customarily exits work life. More and more they are
finding that they can’t. According to Leader-Post,
economists say that if the country is to thrive, it must keep older workers on
the job past traditional retirement.
And this "need" is not limited to Canada; 14 other countries - including Spain, Greece, Italy, Germany and Ireland - are planning to increase their retirement ages to between 67 and 69 by 2050, according to The Washington Post.
The irony is that this experienced individual is often
removed, or segregated, from the workforce because of the occurring prejudices
against their age. An article
about a recent Ipsos Reid survey,
conducted exclusively for Postmedia News, said
that, “51 per cent of those asked said they thought older workers were more
difficult to train on new processes and technology than younger ones.”
Doreen Copeland, 54, who was recently let go from her job
after “serving” 30 years of dedicated work in radio, told Leader-Post that she believed
her seniority was her undoing.
"With
longevity comes a higher salary. And there was always a source of young, eager
people who were willing to work for next to nothing," says Copeland.
"They were breaking down the doors."
So what does this
mean? According to The Vancouver Sun, the dilemma is that what looks like
prejudice may just be practical judgement about the ability of a worker to do a
job, or adapt to change. And it’s true,
we can’t prove when a company has implied an age bias, as other factors may
very well be involved when hiring or firing.
What’s important
is to stay up to date with every day news and changes in the workforce – be it
technology or your new supervisor. Steve
Shifman, President and CEO of Michelman writes that, “you
need to recognize the harsh reality that about one-fifth of what you know, what
you do, and how you do it will become useless next year and that you must replace
that obsolete knowledge with new and relevant skills, knowledge and
experience.”
And
how do we do this Steve?
Check
out Shifman’s article, 4 Ways to Make Your Careers Last Longer, provided by nextavenue, and find out!
In
your mind, at what age do you see yourself retiring?
No comments:
Post a Comment